Translate this page
Rainbow Water headquarters is located on Old Highway 395 in Fallbrook.
Rainbow Water headquarters is located on Old Highway 395 in Fallbrook.

Buckley named Rainbow’s new General Manager


Thursday, April 10th, 2014
Issue 15, Volume 18.
Joe Naiman
Village News Correspondent


Gene Buckley was selected as the new general manager of the Rainbow Municipal Water District.

The Rainbow board’s 5-0 vote March 25 named Buckley as the district’s general manager.

"He’ll do an excellent job," said Rainbow board president George McManigle.

Buckley, who joined the Rainbow Municipal Water District staff in February 2004, had been Rainbow’s assistant general manager and chief finance officer. He served as interim general manager prior to the 2007 hiring of Dave Seymour.

Buckley had been the district’s finance director prior to the hiring of Seymour, who served as Rainbow’s general manager from September 2007 until his retirement in April 2013.

The North County Joint Powers Authority consisting of Rainbow and the Fallbrook Public Utility District was formed in February 2013, and FPUD general manager Brian Brady was named as the North County JPA executive officer. When Seymour retired, Brady was also Advertisement
Advertisement for Berry-Bell and Hall Mortuary
[ Berry-Bell and Hall Mortuary ]
named as Rainbow’s general manager. The reorganization associated with Brady’s hiring changed Buckley’s title from chief financial officer to assistant general manager, and under Rainbow policy Buckley was the district’s acting general manager in Brady’s absence.

On March 6, McManigle provided FPUD with a 30-day notice that the Rainbow board had voted to withdraw from the JPA. On March 10, the FPUD board addressed the JPA’s conflict of interest code which covers incompatible offices; Brady resigned as Rainbow’s general manager without a vote. Buckley became Rainbow’s acting general manager upon Brady’s resignation.

Buckley’s selection is as the district’s general manager rather than as the interim general manager, although his 10 years at the district make him eligible for a pension.

"He is planning to retire. He’s served his time, so we have to actually start looking for a general manager," McManigle said.


 

21 comments

Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #1 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:32 am
Did WE, THE PEOPLE get to vote on this directly? If not, why not?! Where is the REAL democracy?

How much will this new GM be earning?
Do WE, THE PEOPLE get to vote on this directly, too?
If not, why not?
Where is the REAL democracy? Where?
Will Mr. Buckley be earning as much as Dave Seymour did, $300k/year?
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/Mar/07/water-fallbrook-rainbow-joint-powers-merge/
Why do WE, THE PEOPLE continue to take this injustice? When will we DEMAND change through peaceful, legal and nonviolent means? How much longer?

Where is the democracy?
Comment Profile ImageHuh?
Comment #2 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:35 am
Glad to hear the RMWD board appointed Buckley. He is a long time FB kid who did very well for himself and his community. We should all support him in his new role even if it is only for a short while.
Comment Profile Imageoldtimer
Comment #3 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:30 am
Huh?: You are right. Mr. Buckley has provided continuity during the last, very difficult, year. He is accessible, helpful, and supportive to staff. In the absence of a general manager working for Rainbow's interests, he has been invaluable. When he retires, he will be sorely missed.

Lee: Please find some other interests and stop using this forum to make comments on things about which you are not informed. BTW, which agency provides your water?
Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #4 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:31 pm
@ #3 oldtimer

got First Amendment?
Comment Profile ImageOmen
Comment #5 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:31 pm
Rainbow Will Miss MR. Buckley FOR SURE... Lee you got anywhere else you can be besides here like a negative nancy /???
Comment Profile ImageYou can fool some of the people some of the time.....
Comment #6 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:58 pm
Did WE, THE PEOPLE get to vote on this directly? If not, why not?! Where is the REAL democracy? When did we ever get the chance to vote on whether Lee gets to post here or not?
Comment Profile Imageoldtimer
Comment #7 | Thursday, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:33 pm
Lee: I wouldn't dream of interfering with anyone's First Amendment rights. Just hoping you would consider refraining from making inane comments on subjects about which you are obviously not well informed. Do you know who delivers your water, or are you out of the area of both districts? That should be easy to answer.
Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #8 | Friday, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:09 am
@ #5 Omen

You call a democratic vote a negative?

Interesting.


@ #6 You can . . .

So what you are saying is that we need to vote for YOU to make your comments, too.

Interesting.
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.
Post Continued
Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #9 | Friday, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:16 am
@ #7 oldtimer

You just did. Please see your comment #3.
Comment Profile Imageoldtimer
Comment #10 | Friday, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:29 pm
Lee. You didn't read it very well. There was no attempt to stop you from "speaking". It was a polite request that you refrain from commenting on things about which you seemingly have little information. You have every right to say whatever you want, uninformed or not.

And you still won't say which district serves your water needs. Is that because you don't live in an area served by either and comment only to entertain yourself? Or do you just feed off people paying attention to you, even if it is negative?
Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #11 | Friday, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:26 pm
@ #10 oldtimer

Oh, believe-you-me, I read it just fine. Nice try, no cigar. In fact, every time I reread it, I read one and the same thing: you are denying me my First Amendment right by ordering me to "stop using this forum to make comments on things about which you are not informed." How do you call this, an order, a polite request?

I would even argue that in your comment #7 you, once again, are denying me, or at the very least are trying to deny me, my First Amendment rights by asking me to refrain making comments based on YOUR qualification of them, in this case inane. So you believe that somebody should stop making certain comments simply because you believe them to be a certain quality not realizing that you, I suspect, are in no legal position to do so. Are you in a legal position, in your comment #7, to deny me my First Amendment rights? Yes or no.

So oldtimer, explain to me, and you alone -- not your buddies -- how in your comment #3 you are NOT denying me my First Amendment rights? And please answer all the other questions I am asking you.
Comment Profile ImageJAS
Comment #12 | Saturday, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:08 pm
I've known Gene Buckley for years. A GREAT person for the position. He is smart, approachable, listens well, has solutions, rainbow cant ask for a better person right now. This decision has my full support.
Comment Profile Imageoldtimer
Comment #13 | Saturday, Apr 12, 2014 at 3:02 pm
JAS: I agree with you about Gene Buckley. I wish he weren't retiring; he's an asset to the district.

It finally dawned on me that responding at all to commenter #11 is useless and only generates more of the same. So, my apologies. I won't rise to the bait again.
Comment Profile ImageMe
Comment #14 | Sunday, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:41 am
"Buckley’s selection is as the district’s general manager rather than as the interim general manager, although his 10 years at the district make him eligible for a pension."

Only TEN years of service...and you get a pension? That is RIDICULOUS. No wonder Rainbow fleeces it's customers with the highest rates in San Diego County.

Sounds like Buckley is just another early pension grabbing government worker. 10 years...what a joke.
Comment Profile ImageHuh?
Comment #15 | Sunday, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:20 pm
Me, their pensions are prorated, so 10 years isn't anywhere near full pension. They need to work 40 years or so to get full pension. It's not like SS where you put in 40 quarters (10 years) and you are golden.
Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #16 | Sunday, Apr 13, 2014 at 9:39 pm
@ #13 oldtimer

I sincerely hope you have learned your lesson!

In my comment #1, I propose and discuss a democratic vote of the people -- something that I have done and will continue to do -- which is THE cornerstone, or certainly one of several, of our democracy. In your comment #7, you, oldtimer, call this democratic vote inane.

Do you consider yourself a good American?
Do you love your country?
Can you explain how a democratic vote of the people is inane?
Comment Profile ImageMe
Comment #17 | Monday, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:24 am
@Huh?

NOBODY deserves ANY pension after only 10 years. None. Zip. Nada. Zero.
Comment Profile Imageoldtmer
Comment #18 | Monday, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:27 am
The ten years is the time Mr.Buckley has been at Rainbow, not the sum total of his work experience. This is not his first job.
Comment Profile ImageMe
Comment #19 | Monday, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:00 am
@oldtimer

So what? You don't get pensions based on your "work experience."

You earn a pension by staying at ONE particular company for 25 or 30 years...that is except for government workers that is.

Buckley deserves a pension from Rainbow....after another 15 years.
Comment Profile ImageVillage News Reader
Comment #20 | Monday, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:57 am
Lee is trolling. That's all he does here. He never provides anything useful or relevant. He should be ignored.
Comment Profile ImageReally?
Comment #21 | Friday, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:10 am
Nothing to see here; move on. Isolated incident. Lee's statements are taken out of context. It's profiling and a witch hunt. It's Bush's fault. Who are we to judge? I think that covers it. Next story.

BTW- Gene Buckley is a good pick.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.




Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Advertisement for Fallbrook Healthcare Partners





Subscribe




Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login