Translate this page

BUSD defers COP loan

District wonít use loan for Sullivan building

Thursday, April 3rd, 2014
Issue 14, Volume 18.
Joe Naiman
Village News Correspondent
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.

The Bonsall Unified School District will not be utilizing a Certificate of Participation loan to fund the new Sullivan Middle School building, at least for the time being.

During the Feb. 13 BUSD board meeting, the districtís staff was directed to pursue funding options for the two-story, 12-classroom building with an estimated cost of $3.9 million. The likely means of funding was a Certificate of Participation loan, but revenue uncertainties led to a 5-0 board vote March 13 to delay pursuing the COP funding until the California Department of Education can provide more certainty on the Bonsall districtís Local Control Funding Formula revenue.

"Without really having a clear understanding of what our future income is, we just donít feel it would be prudent," said BUSD superintendent Justin Cunningham. "Thatís not a risk that we want to take."

The state has changed its program of funding local schools from solely a per-student amount to a base per-student amount with adjustments for certain grade levels, a supplemental grant amount for targeted disadvantaged students, and a concentration grant for schools whose targeted disadvantaged students constitute at least 55 percent of the total enrollment.

"We donít really know how much weíre going to get," Cunningham said.

BUSD staff has worked with the California Department of Education, the San Diego County Office of Education, and School Services of California, Inc., to develop reasonable revenue projections. School Services of California, Inc., provides independent assessments of district finances. "The folks at School Services, by their calculations, they feel it was a lot less, like one or two million less, than what we were thinking," Cunningham said.

The School Services of California assessment was approximately $1.2 million less than the estimate provided by the San Diego County Office of Education. "This money would have gone towards construction of some new buildings at the middle school," Cunningham said.

"We really should wait until we do know before we jump into something like that," Cunningham said. "We donít want to put the district in a place where debt is becoming too big for us."

The school district had plans to borrow $4 million through the Certificate of Participation program and expected a four percent interest rate, which would equate to annual payments of approximately $250,000 for 25 years.

The school district originally planned to use a Qualified Zone Academy Bond loan with an approximately 1 1/4 percent interest rate for the new building. At one time QZAB loans could be used for new construction but, after the districtís tax attorneys advised that new building would be an ineligible use of the loan district, staff was directed to pursue other sources of funding, including COP loans.

The Feb. 13 change from the initial proposal to fund the building with a QZAB loan and the March 13 rejection of a near-term COP loan will likely delay the construction schedule for the new building which had a January 2015 construction start date and an August 2015 completion date.



Comment Profile ImageZZZ
Comment #1 | Thursday, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:36 pm
The longer BUSD waits, the more it will cost. Make a decision - they change the rules all the time = whatever suits the suits. When you received the bond - those rules should apply, the new ones should not take precedence - take control.
Comment Profile Image???
Comment #2 | Sunday, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:53 pm
Waiting does not make sense. The constant delays do not make sense. Are you waiting for the CDoE to decide to take the money away entirely? Use it or lose it. That's what generally happens in instances like this.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.


Add your Comment


Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.


The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter

Advertisement for Fallbrook Healthcare Partners


Most Commented

Reach Local Customers

The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds