Translate this page
A golfer plays at San Luis Rey Downs golf course.
A golfer plays at San Luis Rey Downs golf course.

‘Save the Downs’ formed to stop mitigation bank; group’s mission is to stop destruction of SLRD golf course


Thursday, March 27th, 2014
Issue 13, Volume 18.
Joe Naiman
Village News Correspondent
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


An organization called Save the Downs has been formed to sway the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers against approving a mitigation bank for the land which includes the San Luis Rey Downs golf course.

The group’s first meeting took place March 14. Save the Downs will meet every Friday afternoon at the Fallbrook Chamber of Commerce office (the board of the Fallbrook chamber has not officially taken a position against the mitigation bank, but during the public comment period the chamber’s executive committee wrote a letter in opposition to the proposal) with the meetings commencing at 4 p.m. Jon Frandell is the chair of Save the Downs, Jeri Walz is the vice-chair, Deborah Howard is the secretary, and Scott Meisterlin is the treasurer.

"The mission is to stop the destruction of San Luis Rey Downs golf course," Frandell said. "It’s just opposition to the mitigation bank."

The San Luis Rey Downs golf course is currently owned by the Vessels family, which has reached an option agreement with the mitigation bank management company Conservation Land Group, Inc. (CLG). CLG has filed an application with the Army Corps of Engineers to create the Moosa Creek Mitigation Bank. The property is approximately 185 acres, including the golf course, with approximately 38 acres of wetlands and 5.75 acresof non-wetland waters. If the Army Corps of Engineers approves the land as a mitigation bank, CLG would rehabilitate and re-establish riverline and depressional wetlands and restore wetland and non-wetland riparian habitat. Developers of property elsewhere could purchase mitigation credits which would fulfill those projects’ off-site mitigation requirements.

The Army Corps of Engineers will evaluate impacts to the public interest during its decision whether to authorize the land as a mitigation bank. The public comment period included a February 24 public hearing; Frandell estimated that between 300 and 400 people attended that meeting and noted that only one member of the audience was in favor of the mitigation bank.

Frandell, Walz, and Howard began holding meetings between themselves following that public hearing. Those three-person meetings led to the creation of Save the Downs, and the group’s March 14 meeting attracted approximately a dozen people.

The objective of Save the Downs is to convince the Army Corps of Engineers to deny the petition by providing legitimate reasons why the destruction of the golf course would create negative impacts in the areas of economics, recreational use, wildlife and watershed protection, and the needs and welfare of the community.

"The thought of that being destroyed and put back into wetlands is just unbelievable," Frandell said. "This is not the right thing."

The economic consequences could include a loss of golf course jobs, declining property values with associated lost property tax revenue for local and regional public agencies, and increased fire insurance premiums for nearby homeowners. "The economic impact is tremendously negative," Frandell said.

Some golf industry professionals believe that the building of golf courses after Tiger Woods increased the sport’s popularity was not matched by increased participation and that some golf courses must be closed for the industry as a whole to remain viable. Frandell noted that the SCGA golf course in Murrieta was recently sold to a buyer who will keep that facility as a golf course and that the Warner Springs Ranch Resort golf course which closed before being sold will soon be reopening. "The idea that the golf courses are a losing proposition is just wrong," Frandell said.

Because of Endangered Species Act mitigation requirements, the San Luis Rey Downs golf course may have more sale value as a mitigation bank than as a golf course, so if the mitigation bank is approved and the option is exercised the Vessels family would make more money selling the golf course to CLG than to an entity who would retain it as a golf course. "We believe in property rights," Frandell said.

A situation five days before the first Save the Downs meeting brought to mind the adage that the reason America has Daylight Savings time is that 60 million golfers have more political clout than two million farmers, so the closure of the San Luis Rey Downs golf course could have a national impact on future mitigation policy and the effort to save the golf course has national support rather than just the support of local golfers and the Bonsall community.

"All the developments that have golf courses or even parks could be destroyed for mitigation objectives," Frandell said.

"Any open space could be threatened," Frandell said. "This is just the first test case."

Some golfers play the San Luis Rey Downs links solely for recreational purposes, but the golf course also hosts fundraising tournaments and practices or meets for local high schools and the Cal State San Marcos golf team.

The wildlife and watershed issues include the impact to existing habitat during restoration efforts. "What they’re proposing is a habitat where all the endangered species reside," Frandell said. "All of these animals exist today."

An estimated 350,000 cubic yards of dirt would need to be moved during the habitat restoration process. Frandell noted that such work would not only impact existing habitat but would also create dust which would adversely affect the health of asthmatics, children, and other nearby residents.

Frandell added that Endangered Species Act regulations were intended to protect remaining habitat rather than to return disturbed land to its natural state. "That is not the intent of any of these," Frandell said. "It’s the protection of what hasn’t been developed."

Frandell noted that the protection of the land in perpetuity could be threatened by floods or by increased costs which deplete the endowment used for maintenance.

"It’s our community. If we don’t stand up, nobody else will," Frandell said.


 

7 comments

Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)
Comment #1 | Wednesday, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 pm
Take away the ponds and what actually resides on this course besides illegal aliens. I say, let it go folks.
Comment Profile ImageWho
Comment #2 | Thursday, Mar 27, 2014 at 5:45 pm
First of all, none of the “board members” of Save The Downs even live within sight of the golf course and in fact Frandell and Meisterlin don’t even live in Bonsall. Really? It sounds like they just want to keep their golf course open but here’s the reality. If the mitigation bank does not buy the course it will most likely be closed while another buyer is found. So in the mean time Bonsall has a dead brown golf course instead of a natural open space area. For the sake of argument let’s say they find another buyer who wants to keep it as a golf course. The Vessels family has been attempting to run this course as a profitable business for over 30 years, and for that last 10 years without success. Who is to say that another owner could do any better? Especially an owner who would buy a business that has been losing money for 10 years. In the end there are basically two choices. A natural open space habitat or an ugly dead golf course. Finally I would like to point out that the true damage to property values for those of us that live on the golf course will come from uncertainty and the possibility that the golf course will be dead and abandoned. There are just as many people who will pay more to live on an open space area as there are that want to live on a golf course. At this point none of us could sell at true value anyway because the new buyer does not know what to expect. Don’t give in to a small vocal group of golfers. They can play at Fallbrook or Pala Mesa.
Comment Profile ImageReality Check
Comment #3 | Friday, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:16 am
I have heard that SD County is requiring a sand mining permit to keep Moosa Creek free and clear of debris and sand build up that continues the flooding on Camino Del Rey year after year. That sounds like a very expensive and on-going process. If that's the case nobody in their right mind would buy an already financially distressed golf course with that cost to overcome year after year. Besides, the Vessels are not going to sell the land for a fraction of what its worth and it sounds like its worth much more as mitigation land than as a golf course. I think we should start working with the Mitigation Bank rather than against them. Maybe they will include some public trails or open space on a portion of the land. That way everybody is happy. Nothing will hurt my property value more than an abandoned golf course. Drive by Escondido County Club and see for yourself.
Comment Profile ImageJD
Comment #4 | Tuesday, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:23 pm
I read this article carefully, and have read others on this topic. It's very confusing what a Mitigation Bank is. Can someone explain this? It seems the property has value, if somehow development is allowed. Will that happen? Anyway, I agree with "Who RU kidding" The argument about day light savings time, and this being a test case for the country..what a laugh!
Comment Profile ImageLynn
Comment #5 | Tuesday, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:53 pm
With Bill Horn as our county supervisor I'm sure they could put in anything they wanted to. There 's no type of development that he wouldn't support
Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)
Comment #6 | Wednesday, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:14 am
Somebody.... quick..... plant a smelt in one of the ponds......
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.
Post Continued
Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)
Comment #7 | Wednesday, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:41 am
Lynn:

In regards to your comment, there are no dead presidents he would not support. Get my drift.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.




Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Advertisement for Fallbrook Healthcare Partners





Subscribe




Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login