Translate this page
Ivy High School students, left to right, D’Aquino Small, Ismael Luna, and Francisco Lopez, warm up for soccer practice after school; deterioration to ...
Rusted panels covering an electrical box are typical of repairs needed at Ivy High School. In the background, students talk after school.
Rusted panels covering an electrical box are typical of repairs needed at Ivy High School. In the background, students talk after school.

Ivy High School to get $1.4 million in modernization improvements

Tear down for school project slated for June 1

Thursday, March 6th, 2014
Issue 10, Volume 18.
Andrea Verdin
Special to The Village News
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.

The Fallbrook Union High School District (FUHSD) board of trustees recently approved a modernization project for Ivy High School which will include new portable classrooms.

According to a recent FUHSD meeting agenda, the total anticipated budget for the project is $1,487,075. The budget covers architectural services, pre-construction services, construction services, the portable buildings, and a contingency budget. Approximately $750,000 will be used for construction costs.

"The buildings were old," said Ivy principal Melissa Marovich. "The buildings were purchased used in 1978. As the years passed, the prefabricated buildings were cobbled together, and it’s obvious that they really have a shelf life. Some of the original buildings were rebuilt to extend that shelf life, but it became apparent [new buildings were needed]."

The project will leave the high school with the same footprint, but with more cohesiveness, said Marovich.

"We are going to tear the whole thing down," she said. "The new buildings will look permanent and cohesive in layout."

In addition, the new cohesion of the buildings will allow for better security at Ivy, stated Marovich, who also said that the project is set to take place immediately after graduation this year.

Wil Hatcher, FUHSD chief business officer, stated that the school’s utility systems will also be brought up to current code.

"We will be doing grading and new plumbing," he said. "The school will look more like the district office buildings."

"We have to move out the day after graduation because they are tearing down everything on June 1," she said. "They are going to have the project done in 60 days or less."

Erickson-Hall, the construction company in charge of the modernization project, has done similar projects at schools in the Grossmont area with similar timelines, said Marovich.

"They say it shouldn’t be a problem for them," she explained. "It helps that the buildings are prefabricated, and will be simply rolled off the trucks."

"This year made the most sense [for construction]," said Hatcher. "With the new summer calendar, we have a three month window. Last summer wouldn’t have worked with the new academic calendar."

"We began working with the architect almost a year ago, so the plans have been well under way," he continued. "It sounds simple, but things are always more complicated than they seem. So if we are not quite ready to move in for school [at the beginning of the 2014-2015 academic year], we will move Ivy students to the 400 buildings [at Fallbrook High], which have not been in use because of declining enrollment."

The funds for the modernization project are coming from the developer fees fund, also known as the capital facilities fund, said Hatcher.

"This fund is strictly for buildings," he said. "We are upgrading technology and curriculum through Common Core funds so that they meet new state standards in the upcoming years, so it wouldn’t make sense to purchase new materials."

"[Modernizing buildings at Ivy] has been the intent for these funds since 2010-2011," continued Hatcher. "The buildings were seriously dilapidated. About five years ago, one of the buildings collapsed, and about eight feet had to be cut off of the wall."

Hatcher does not see any large concerns with the modernization project being completed within deadline.

"I have been involved with many renovation projects, and each has its own peculiarities and uniqueness," he said. "I don’t see any part of it that strikes me as not being done well under time."

Marovich stated students are excited for the new buildings.

"Seniors are proud to be the last class to graduate from the old buildings, and the other students are excited to be the first to graduate from the new buildings," she said.



Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)
Comment #1 | Friday, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:10 pm
Where did all this money come from? Cookie sales?
Comment Profile ImageFHS Layoffee
Comment #2 | Friday, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:44 pm
No. More like my income...and many others the District decided to layoff the last few years.
Comment Profile Image@Ray
Comment #3 | Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:29 am
It states in the article: The funds for the modernization project are coming from the developer fees fund, also known as the capital facilities fund, said Hatcher.
Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)Taxpayers
Comment #4 | Saturday, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:19 pm

How about from the parents.
Comment Continued : The comment above was written from the same location.
Post Continued
Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)
Comment #5 | Monday, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:26 pm
Geez..... No Monday? Well..... the only place "free and public education" is mentioned is the "federalist papers", the federalist papers one might say? they are "minutes" of discussions by the founding fathers.

Now the "liberals" of the time, Thomas Jefferson, made note to this for TWO reasons, One being that the fear of an uneducated electorate would damage the democracy, puts the black and hispanic vote in question and religion played an important role in this country and education.

Nowhere in "rights" does it say, "free and public" and "separation of church and state". Inaddition does it say the "public" must pay for this education.

The only reason why "church" got involved was the uneducated population needed to be able to read the bible. Ends the church vs. state liberal whine.

Let`s tell the truth (Monday) and not listyen to the "babble" you spew.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.


Add your Comment


Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.


The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter

Advertisement for Fallbrook Healthcare Partners


Most Commented

Reach Local Customers

The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2015
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds