Translate this page

Per diem increase rejected at RMWD; proposal was to increase from $150 to $300


Thursday, February 27th, 2014
Issue 09, Volume 18.
Joe Naiman
Village News Correspondent
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


The Rainbow Municipal Water District board considered doubling the per diem payment Rainbow directors receive for attending meetings before rejecting the increase on a 3-2 vote Jan. 28.

Jack Griffiths and George McManigle voted in favor of increasing the per diem compensation from $150 to $300. Helene Brazier, Bob Lucy, and Dennis Sanford voted against the higher per diem.

The last per diem increase for Rainbow directors was approved by the board in November 1999 and took effect in January 2000. That increase changed the per diem amount from $100 to $150. In December, Griffiths proposed an increase in the per diem to $300 effective after the November 2014 elections.

Rainbow staff compiled a survey of per diem pay for board members of the 17 water districts who are members of the San Diego County Water Authority, the SDCWA board itself, the Sweetwater Authority joint powers agency, two wastewater district boards in San Diego County, and three southern Riverside County water districts.

The two highest per diem amounts were the $221.43 of the Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and the $206 for Eastern Municipal Water District directors. The highest 2013 per diem amount for a San Diego County agency in the survey was $200, which is given to directors of the Helix Water District and to Santa Fe Irrigation District board members.

Three of the agencies had per diem increases for 2014, and Yuima Municipal Water District directors will be paid $202 for this year’s meetings after receiving $195 last year. The per diem pay for Fallbrook Public Utility District directors includes an annual escalation clause and rose from $115.76 for 2013 to $121.55 for 2014 meetings. As of March 1, Padre Dam Municipal Water District directors will see a per diem increase from $117 to $128.

Six agencies have $100 per diem policies: Carlsbad (the city’s water district is officially a separate agency, although the Carlsbad City Council members are the water agency directors), the San Dieguito Water District (whose board members are also on the Encinitas City Council), the Otay Water District, the Ramona Municipal Water District, the South Bay Irrigation District, and the Valley Center Municipal Water District. Lakeside Water District directors receive per diem pay of $125.

Four other agencies join Rainbow with $150 per diem amounts: the Olivenhain Municipal Water District, the Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District, the Sweetwater Authority (which consists of the South Bay Irrigation District and the City of National City’s water department), and the Vallecitos Water District. SDCWA board members who are not officers receive a per diem of $150 while SDCWA board officers are given $180 for each meeting.

Board members of the North County Joint Powers Authority, which consists of Rainbow and FPUD, receive per diem of $150 per NCJPA meeting, although a non-voting alternate does not receive per diem pay.


 

7 comments

Comment Profile ImageLee
Comment #1 | Thursday, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:42 pm
Wow! Think about it, folks. These, aah, shall we say lovely people actually considered giving themselves a raise in (A) these tough economic times, (B) in this drought, and (C) WITHOUT the consent and vote of THE PEOPLE. Oh, and by the way, folks, did you catch that little bit about the increase being . . . 100% while, oh you know, we are told that our inflation rate is around 3%?! Did you catch that, folks? Anybody ticked off like me?

Maybe, juuuuuuuuust maybe, they are starting to feel the heat. Good.

WE, THE PEOPLE!

PS. Why and how do "employees" of a municipality get a pay anyway? Isn't a municipality in existence to NOT make money?!
Comment Profile Imagenickycc
Comment #2 | Thursday, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:49 pm
sounds as if griffiths and mcmanigle are greedy. this mindset has helped lead to rainbow water being much higher than similar districts.
Comment Profile ImageBB
Comment #3 | Thursday, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:53 pm
Inflation since 1999 is only 3%? Municipalities are not supposed to pay their labor??
Comment Profile ImageDR DR
Comment #4 | Thursday, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:41 pm
Per diem is not a laborer and not on the payroll. It's a check for the time one spent traveling and sitting for a meeting. $150 for a day, even if they sat for 2 hours.
Comment Profile ImageAvo Farmer
Comment #5 | Thursday, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:19 pm
I've seen a number of times when the directors only come in for half a meeting and then quietly slip out. Do they still get their full per diem when they are only there for a few minutes? If they cared at all about us users, they would be scheduling the two meeting on the same day. We should demand it. Lets get Jack and George voted off. That would be a good start.
Comment Profile ImageDR DR
Comment #6 | Friday, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:33 pm
Yes, Avo Farmer, they would still get the $150 for showing up for 2 min. That is why they only stay 2 min. Gas, wear and tear, lunch and 'time' is $150.00.
Comment Profile ImageHistorian
Comment #7 | Monday, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:59 pm
Funny that the last time the Board voted to give themselves a raise in November 1999, the item was listed on the agenda to eliminate per diem altogether. One Board member had requested the item for discussion to save the District money. Three Board members got together and gave themselves a 50% raise instead! I am surprised Jack was so greedy with the District in a state of "austerity" that he did not go for $225 since it may have passed!

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.




Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Advertisement for Stellar Solar





Subscribe




Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login