Translate this page

CWA requests terms, conditions for Meadowood


Thursday, July 25th, 2013
Issue 30, Volume 17.
Joe Naiman
Village News Correspondent


The San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) board requested that the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) set formal terms and conditions for the Valley Center Municipal Water District’s proposed annexation of the Meadowood development area which would also annex that area into MWD and the SDCWA. The Meadowood development is planned along the Interstate 15 corridor in eastern Fallbrook.

The CWA resolution requesting that MWD set formal terms and conditions was approved June 27 without opposition. On July 9, MWD held a public hearing on standby charges for the annexation to allow for public comment, although no action regarding the annexation was taken. MWD is expected to consider the terms and conditions at a fall board meeting.

"The terms and conditions are based on the Water Authority’s annexation policies," said CWA water resources specialist Lesley Dobalian. "At a staff level we evaluate the annexation based on these policies."

In January 2012, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors approved Pardee Homes’ Meadowood project which will include 397 single-family homes, 447 multi-family housing units, 13 acres for an elementary school which will be built by the Bonsall Unified School District, four acres of park land, 128 acres of biological open space, 47 acres of agricultural open space, 5.9 miles of trails, and a wastewater treatment plant.

The Meadowood area is within the San Luis Rey Municipal Water District, which is not part of the San Diego County Water Authority, and the Board of Supervisors’ conditions included annexation of the Meadowood property into the SDCWA. The total property consists of 384 acres, although only the 267 acres proposed for development will be annexed into the water districts.

In February 2006, the CWA board adopted a set of 13 annexation policies covering relationship to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and MWD policies, protection of member agency supply reliability, conservation and local supply use requirements, annexation fees, priority for annexations to an existing CWA agency, concurrent annexations to other water agencies, necessary connection facilities, environmental compliance, consistency with land use approvals, annexation of commonly-owned lands, avoidance of surrounded annexed or unannexed territory, administrative costs, and annexation of tribal lands.

In April 2010, the CWA updated the policy to address sufficiency for supplies of other member agencies. The determination of a potential adverse impact includes whether the additional supply needs were already considered in the Urban Water Management Plan, whether actual demands are exceeding forecasted demand, whether a Drought Management Plan has been activated, and whether facility constraints exist.

That update also requires a member agency which would be annexing the new area to develop additional supply as an offset for the increased demand. The policy directs the CWA to evaluate the adequacy of water supplies and facilities to meet the needs of the proposed annexed territory based Advertisement
Advertisement for Casa Tiene Vista
[ Casa Tiene Vista ]
on adopted CWA facilities and supply plans including the most recent Water Facilities Master Plan and Urban Water Management Plan.

The only policy which was not satisfied was the payment of the annexation fee, which will be part of the final conditions. A $3,000 administrative fee was received to cover processing costs, and the CWA annexation fee rate of $2,929 per acre equates to approximately $782,000. Pardee Homes will be responsible for all annexation and processing fees including all Valley Center and San Luis Rey district fees, all CWA and MWD fees, and all LAFCO and State Board of Equalization charges.

The CWA’s June 27 action was the fourth of seven necessary governing board approvals and the second of three needed CWA board approvals. In April 2012, the Valley Center Municipal Water District board unanimously approved a resolution requesting concurrent annexation of that area into the CWA and MWD. CWA staff reviewed the documents for compliance with the CWA annexation policies, and in October 2012, the CWA board approved a resolution establishing preliminary informal terms and conditions while requesting that MWD grant conditional approval for annexation. MWD adopted a resolution granting conditional approval May 14 while also adopting the resolution of intent to impose standby charges.

The next step is for MWD to approve the annexation while fixing terms and conditions. The CWA’s final step will be to adopt a resolution to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the annexation and accept MWD’s terms and conditions for any approval. The final step will involve San Diego County’s LAFCO, which is responsible for jurisdictional boundary changes. LAFCO will file a notice of completion after the terms and conditions of the water agencies are satisfied. A formal LAFCO hearing for the annexation will be required, and LAFCO will also need to update the Valley Center district’s sphere of influence to include the area.

The Environmental Impact Report for Meadowood cited an approximate water demand from the CWA of 329 acre-feet per year and a projected maximum daily demand on CWA facilities of 1.1 cubic feet per second. During winter months, recycled water from the treatment plant would meet irrigation demands, although the summer irrigation demand would likely exceed the available recycled water and groundwater would also be used for irrigation. The total estimated annual demand is 609 acre-feet, which includes 189 acre-feet of recycled water and 91 acre-feet of groundwater in addition to the 329 acre-feet of imported water from the CWA.

The Valley Center district would also need to establish a new connection to the CWA aqueduct system to serve Meadowood. Other facilities would include a flow control facility, a water transmission pipeline from the CWA’s First Aqueduct or Second Aqueduct, and potable reservoir storage. The Valley Center terms and conditions include construction of such facilities at Pardee’s expense.


 

5 comments

Comment Profile ImageJack Griffiths
Comment #1 | Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:39 pm
My comments have already been sent to LAFCO.
1. I fully agree with Valley Center MWD being the conduit for fresh water.
2. Recycled sewage water from a small treatment plant is generally not considered suitable for farm irrigation (only perhaps for some grasses) and careful consideration must be given to the actual use or disposal of the water and the resulting sludge.
Comment Profile ImageSeriously??
Comment #2 | Sunday, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:48 am
Yuck!!
Comment Profile ImageValley Center homeowner
Comment #3 | Monday, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:21 pm
I fully DISAGREE with VCMWD being responsible for supplying water this development. What happens when we next go to water restrictions with hundreds of new customers to service as well. Pardee builds, pocket their $$$ then walks away leaving us locals to deal with the mess.

Who do I complain to? How do I protest this lousy idea?
Comment Profile Image@VCH
Comment #4 | Monday, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:31 pm
Ask Lee
Comment Profile ImageHuh?
Comment #5 | Tuesday, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:08 pm
Valley Center homeowner, you do just what we did when Pardee tried to do the same thing with Rainbow. You hold recall elections for your board members, throw out the "good old boys" and vote in a board that watches out for the ratepayers.

That's the day RMWD started turning things around with men like McManigle, Petty and Lucy on their side.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.




Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Advertisement for Fallbrook Healthcare Partners


Subscribe





Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login