Translate this page

Who can afford to buy a house these days?


Thursday, March 14th, 2013
Issue 11, Volume 17.


Some claim that real estate is recovering. Wages are stagnating, unemployment is still high, credit hard to get, and income inequality worst than it has been since the Great Depression. Yet, sales are up.

A recent report (1) says that foreclosure sales and short sales accounted for 43 percent of 947,995 homes sold last year in the nation. These homes are sold at massive discounts, which would seem like a good thing for potential home owners. However, individual families aren’t buying up these homes; Wall Street investors are scooping them up, often right on courthouse steps. In 2011, 27 percent of all home purchases were made by such investors (2). The numbers for 2012 haven’t been tallied yet, but look to Advertisement
Advertisement for Christ the King  Lutheran Church
[ Christ the King Lutheran Church ]
be much higher.

Wall Street has already raised $10 billion for real-estate owned properties (REOs). Hedge fund Blackstone announced last November that it would spend $100 million a week on such endeavors (2). And why are investment firms buying up all these homes? To rent to you. Often, the first renters are those that just had their home bought out from under them.

But the most frightening element of all this is the move by these billionaires and bankers to securitize rental revenues. This is exactly what transpired prior to 2007, except it was securitized mortgages. Wall Street has turned its hungry eyes from home-buyers to home-renters.

We saw what this did to home prices. What will it do to home rental rates?

(1) www.realtytrac.com/

(2) www.newrepublic.com/article/112395/wall-street-hedge-funds-buy-rental-properties/

Forest Rhodes


 

4 comments


Comment Profile ImageExactly
Comment #1 | Thursday, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:21 pm
Pottersvile, USA
Population, you

Comment Profile Imagereality bites
Comment #2 | Friday, Mar 15, 2013 at 8:44 am
Let's face the facts. For a hundred years, the average priced home was 3.5 times the average annual salary. Raising interest rates and taxes only make homes less affordable. The 2007 housing bubble was mostly created by loose mortgage lending practices of giving large loans to people that should not have been given those loans. If there wasn't any cheap money, people wouldn't have bid the prices up to where they ended up going. After the bubble burst in 2007, housing prices dropped to where they should have been in the first place. Now the Fed, and the government are trying to prop the economy up by creating a second housing bubble but because of stricter lending rules such as Dodd-Frank, they can't give out as many undercollateralize loans so many homes are going to the institutional investors this time around. Down the road, probably in less than five years, the Feds current policies of low interest rate loans and massive money printing will come back as huge price increases in all commodities, especially food, energy, and building costs. The Fed will be forced to increase interest rates to try and cool things down. I think you are right that rents will rise especially in California where taxes will continue to be increased. Currently all economists agree that rent control is always counterproductive. However, don't be surprised if the government implements it anyway and California becomes just another Detroit.

Comment Profile ImageRay (the real one)
Comment #3 | Sunday, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:01 pm
Obamanomics

Comment Profile ImageTom
Comment #4 | Saturday, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:34 pm
I agree completely with Forest and reality bites. The securitizing of rental incomes, as was done with sub-prime mortgages, empowers these firms to finance their agressive accumulation of assets. Hardly Obamanomics as Ray implies, with that same strategy having previously cratered our economy under Bush, the failure of Obama and Congress to rein in big banks, investment bankers and Wall Street (whose risk-exposure to derivative investments is larger than ever) after watching them drain down the middle class, is a complete dereliction of their duties. Only the abrogation of these grossly speculative and insidious activities can restore the foundation under our homes.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.
Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.



RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Subscribe



Advertisement for Temecula Dining




Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 127 West Elder Street, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2013
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login