Translate this page

Army Corps of Engineers holds Gregory Canyon hearing

Thursday, February 7th, 2013
Issue 06, Volume 17.
Joe Naiman
Village News Correspondent
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers held a public hearing on the proposed Gregory Canyon landfill Jan. 31 at the California Center for the Arts in Escondido.

Gregory Canyon, Ltd. has completed the process of having the state Environmental Impact Report certified and now needs a federal environmental statement certification. Gregory Canyon, Ltd. filed an application for a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit with the Army Corps of Engineers, which released a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on Dec. 11. The landfill and its associated infrastructure would impact approximately one acre of "waters of the United States" which are regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers.

The Draft Environmental Impact Statement has a 120-day public comment period which ends April 15, and written comments will be accepted until then. The Jan. 31 hearing allowed for oral presentations.

"We feel that Thursday’s hearing went in a very balanced way. It was a good presentation on the public’s behalf and we felt that we had a balanced number of speakers," said Gregory Canyon spokesperson Nancy Chase.

"I thought that it went pretty well," said Pala Band of Mission Indians environmental coordinator Shasta Gaughen, who has been fighting against the landfill.

The hearing began at 6 p.m. and ended at 9:30 p.m. Public comment was cut off at the end of the 3 1/2 hour hearing, so the true number of planned speakers for and against cannot be determined. Organized presentations and representatives from government agencies spoke first and were followed by individual commenters who were called upon to speak in the order in which they submitted their speaker slips.

Approximately 400 people attended the hearing. "It was one of the larger ones that we’ve been to," said San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) water resources manager Larry Purcell, who spoke at the hearing.

The Army Corps of Engineers provided a panel with Los Angeles district commanding officer Col. Mark Toy, regulatory division chief Dave Castanon, San Diego office supervisor Therese Bradford, and project manager Bill Miller. "They were taking it very seriously by bringing down all their decision-makers, so that was good to see that," Purcell said.

The SDCWA will also submit written comments addressing the CWA’s concerns about the impacts the landfill’s construction and operation would have on CWA infrastructure. "Our board has a position of neutrality on the landfill itself, but we do want to make sure our concerns are addressed," Purcell said.

The closure of the public comment period will be followed by a review of those hearing and written comments along with responses to those comments. "They have to sort through them and respond to them," Purcell said.

The timeframe to respond to those comments cannot be ascertained at this time. "They say six to eight months; I wouldn’t be surprised if it takes them longer than that," Gaughen said.

"We’re hoping it will be within several months after the end of the comment period," Chase said.

The comments will be incorporated into the final environmental impact statement. "They’re going to have to revise the EIS to reflect those comments," Gaughen said.

In addition to an Army Corps of Engineers permit, the Gregory Canyon landfill would also require permitting from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The RWQCB will likely wait until the completion of the Army Corps of Engineers action before holding its own hearing.



Comment Profile ImageBill smith
Comment #1 | Friday, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:23 pm
Army Corps of Engineers is a joke. Good thing we now have sequestrations and budget cuts for overpaid government employees.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.


Add your Comment


Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.


The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter

Advertisement for Stellar Solar


Most Commented

Reach Local Customers

The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2015
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds