Fallbrook/Bonsall Village News
Arrow Site Map

Proposed Liberty Quarry will likely remain top local issue in 2010

Bookmark
Print
Translate this page

Bookmark and Share

Gary Johnson, aggregate resource manager forGranite Construction Co., uses a map to point out the location of the proposed Liberty Quarry.
Paul Gallaher photo.
Gary Johnson, aggregate resource manager for Granite Construction Co., uses a map to point out the location of the proposed Liberty Quarry.
Tim O'Leary
Staff writer

Thursday, January 7th, 2010.
Issue 01, Volume 14.

A grinding controversy over whether to allow a granite mine to open near the boundary of Fallbrook and Temecula will continue to galvanize public and business attention throughout much of this year, leaders of both sides agree.

It will likely be months before the first round of public hearings begin on a proposal to extract 270 million tons of sand, gravel and other materials from an area south of the city over a 75-year period.

And the debate that has unfolded over several years could again be shadowed by a city bid to annex about 4,500 acres that surrounds the hotly-debated Liberty Quarry site.

"It’s a long process," Karie Reuther, director of community relations for Granite Construction Co., which operates mines in the Indio and Pala areas, said in a recent telephone interview. At that time, she conceded that the project will likely keep its top billing as the most contentious issue in the Temecula area for much of 2010.

The last full debate that centered on the quarry occurred Sept. 24, but key steps have followed that set the stage for future hearings. The full scope of those hearings is still uncertain, as the city has not yet moved forward with a new annexation application.

"I think we’re going to get something from them, but I don’t know what the timeline will be," George Spiliotis, chief executive of a Riverside County boundary-setting agency, said in a recent telephone interview.

Meanwhile, those in opposition and support for the project continue to dig in with letters, signs, advertising and press releases. They disagree on nearly every key point.

"As I pass by Rainbow and enter Temecula each evening I find the area breathtakingly beautiful," Julia Tschritter, a Temecula resident who carpools to work in San Diego, said in a recent letter to local officials and newspapers.

"Aside from the health risks, water concerns, traffic and air pollution that the quarry would create or enhance," the letter continued, "it would break my heart to see the beauty of one of the one of the prettiest areas in Riverside County marred by the quarry."

Proponents reject such claims.

"We support the Liberty Quarry project not only because of the huge economic boost it will provide the region, but because studies have found traffic and air quality will improve thanks to Liberty Quarry," Greg Morrison, president of the Murrieta-Temecula Group said in press release last month.

"We’ll be getting trucks off the road and providing a local source of construction materials for our schools, roads and other development," said Morrison, who leads the business- and government-oriented group.

Some local residents like Cynthia Myers of Rainbow conclude that Granite is motivated by "avarice and greed." Others like former Granite employee Jeff Bradley, a Murrieta resident, say it is "a company of values, concerns and responsibilities."

The most recent formal step in the long development review process occurred Nov. 21, which is when an extended comment period closed for the quarry’s approximately 7,000-page environmental impact report.

The report was released in July following three years of detailed studies on air quality, traffic circulation, lights, noise, water use and other potential impacts. The comment period netted 219 letters that cited or raised issues or requested more data.

County consultants have begun to evaluate and respond to those comments Advertisement
Shriners Hospital for Children
Shriners Hospital for Children
and requests, Reuther said. A recent scoping meeting between the county and Granite ended with expectations that the final environmental report will be finished in the late spring.

If that timetable holds true, the first hearings on the quarry plan would likely occur in the summer. Those hearings would be held by the county Planning Commission. That panel would make approval or denial recommendations to the county Board of Supervisors.

The 155-acre mine site is wedged between Temecula and Rainbow west of Interstate 15. It anchors a rock-strewn bluff behind a California Highway Patrol truck inspection and weigh station near the San Diego County boundary.

The site flanks a sensitive San Diego State University nature reserve and research station that is split by the Santa Margarita River. The river, which is formed by the merger of several creeks, flows about 27 miles to the coast.

The potential impacts on the 4,281-acre reserve and research station – as well as wildlife corridors that crisscross the area – are a key focus of the environmental analysis and the opposition to the quarry.

Mine foes say Liberty Quarry would also increase air pollution, boost area truck traffic, mar scenic views and also deplete scarce regional water supplies.

Granite officials and other mine supporters cite a growing need for construction materials and a desire to reduce the miles that sand and gravel must currently be shipped to reach local construction and road building sites. They also point to the jobs and future tax revenues that Liberty Quarry would bring to the area.

As the development review process unfolds, another front in the fight could reopen. In Temecula, where a majority of the City Council opposes the quarry, a bid to annex than 4,500 acres of granite-strewn hills south of its boundary.

The original annexation attempt was denied by the county Local Agency Formation Commission on June 4. That hearing lasted nearly 10 hours and drew comments from more than 100 speakers.

Approval of the annexation request could have placed oversight of the quarry development plan in the city’s hands rather than the county. Granite officials feared such a step because the city planned to put a zoning change in place that would have prevented mining from occurring in the area for several years.

Temecula appealed that denial and tried to modify the request by removing the quarry site from the land that would be annexed. LAFCO members rejected that modification Sept. 24. Members of that panel later agreed that such a request would have to be made in a formal application rather than part of an appeal.

Thus far, Temecula has spent more than $365,000 over a period of several years on annexation-related studies, reports, application fees and other costs, city records show. Faced with the prospect of having its site rezoned, Granite officials said they felt compelled to spend more than $300,000 to counter the city’s annexation plan.

Temecula would need to pay an additional $9,200 to continue to press forward with an annexation proposal, said Spiliotis, LAFCO chief executive. Granite officials say they expect the city to proceed with an altered annexation proposal even though it is unclear if or how it might affect a county decision on whether Liberty Quarry will be allowed to operate.


 

6 comments


cram it granite
Comment #1 | Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 8:25 am
According to the State Mining and Geology Board's own report card, Riverside county will be the "lead agency" if this is approved and the county previously, has had "overall poor performance" in all areas of mining oversight and compliance. Further, if Granite fails to live up to it's mandated conditions, the issue will be forwarded to an ethics committee of which none other than the CEO and president of Granite Construction, William G. Dorey, has been elected to the Chairman of CIECI . Granite has been fined many times in the past and these are like parking tickets to multi-million dollar contractors. Fema has Granite under investigation for violations over debris clean-up contracts in San Diego County and further impacts to real estate will affect both counties as California real estate disclosure law 1102 thru 1102.15 will give new home buyers a three day 'right to cancel' if the quarry is not discloised in escrow documents. I've left out earthquake fault lines, health and traffic because these issues have been cited over and over at every debate as obvious reasons to question the Granite P.R. Machine. When I attended the last air impact hearing for Rosemary Mountain Quarry, Granite made it sound like everybody should want a quarry in their own yard. No mention of the recent relaxed conditions of particulate matter size standards for the mining industry by the EPA. Write your concers to your elected reps and Riverside county planning commission. s duvall

Time for Common Sense
Comment #2 | Friday, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:46 am
One simply needs to look at Granite's pathetic record of regulation compliance at other sites to see this should be killed immediatly.

observant
Comment #3 | Monday, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:08 am
The quarry will be nothing compared to the monster that is Interstate 15.

Whatever you people are trying to save, I-15 has already destroyed it.

nick on the heights
Comment #4 | Monday, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:21 pm
the quarry will impact us in rainbow much much more than u folks down the hill. the region needs the product produced. observant is right-i can hear the freeway at midnight from a mile away.

JasonB
Comment #5 | Tuesday, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:15 am
It seems it would have been more economically sound to just have found a new place by now.

It's the money, honey.
Comment #6 | Tuesday, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:41 am
It's about the money. They stand to make a fortune off of this site, and I think they feel they'll have it in the bag eventually. After all, they have the money, and we do not. They'll simply outspend. The assertian that the particulate won't bother us is laughable.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.
Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.



RSS Feed
Online Digital Edition
Sign up  for iNews
Earthquake Information

Adrail Advertisement

Adrail Advertisement





Most Commented
The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 127 West Elder Street, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2010
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login