Translate this page

Union favors costly ‘merit system’ for FUESD


Thursday, March 13th, 2008
Issue 11, Volume 12.
Sarah Bates
Special to the Village News


As a result of employee dissatisfaction arising from district disciplinary action involving a bus driver, the Fallbrook Union Elementary School District (FUESD) classified employee union, California School Employee Association (CSEA), has asked the district’s school board to implement a "merit system district."

On March 3, school board members, administrators and the public heard a presentation on merit system districts by Steve Sonnich, former director of personnel for the Carlsbad Unified School District, where a merit system district is in place.

Sonnich is now chief human resources officer for the Grossmont Union High School District.

California’s Education Code covers merit system districts. There are nearly 100 such school districts in California.

According to Jim Whitlock, the assistant superintendent of the district, who oversees employer relations, about half the county school districts are merit system districts.

In an advisory memo, Whitlock said, "Merit systems (i.e. civil service) were a response to the spoils system of the early and middle 1800s. The first merit system in the nation for school districts was passed by the California legislature in 1935, largely in response to lobbying by the CSEA."

A merit system school district includes, along with its school board, a personnel commission comprised of three members selected to serve three year staggered terms. One commissioner is from the school board, one from the classified employee union and the third appointed by the first two commissioners selected.

It also has a director of classified personnel, a job separate from Whitlock’s.

The California School Personnel Commissioner’s Association states, "The State Education Code provides that the personnel commissioners shall classify positions; hear appeals of disciplinary and dismissal matters, and protests involving examinations, selection and appointment procedures; and prescribe rules related to a variety of personnel practices."

This gives a better voice to the classified people so that their issues are heard by an impartial group, says union member Gaylen Brady.

"It is my understanding that if the school board makes a decision on a classified person, a merit system district can also hear the issue and possibly overturn [the decision]," Brady says. "Then, that decision is binding on the school board."

Union spokesperson Vicky Nelson says concerns are premature. "Right now we are fact-finding, talking Advertisement
Advertisement for Casa Tiene Vista
[ Casa Tiene Vista ]
to other districts that have merit systems."

She says their union tried to establish a merit system five to six years ago, so the issue is nothing new. However, since they have "continued to have [their] struggles" and an event occurred which she would not discuss, it seemed the right time to try again.

The move puzzles Whitlock. Wondering what the advantage for the union could be, he says people working for the district have always been hired through a fair selection process. "I’ve never had a formal complaint since I came here in 1993," he says.

"Do you make a formal complaint to the guy who has the power to fire you if he possibly has been involved in the complaint?" asks Brady.

Under the present practice, if a job opening occurs, the district automatically looks for a qualified replacement from its own ranks. Ninety percent of the time, they fill jobs from within, Whitlock says.

With a merit system in place, the criteria is different. For example, applicants will have to take tests.

Pressing forward, Whitlock believes the classified personnel intend to present a petition to the board as its first step. It takes a vote of 15 percent of the union.

If approved, the merit system could be in place by June 30.

The most troubling aspect of the issue is cost. Whitlock says the expense to the district could be as much as $200,000, money that would come out of the district General Fund.

To manage it, in light of the deep budget cuts now expected, he points to additional staff layoffs – some likely from the already lean classified employee staff pushing for the merit system.

Brady says, "This has been in the works before the big budget crisis" and wonders at Whitlock’s assessment of the cost.

"I’d like that job," he says.

Nelson claims she was "shocked" when she heard that amount, commenting that when Whitlock retires in December, leaving a position that will not be filled, the commensurate salary – around $82,000 – could be used to hire a director of classified personnel.

Regarding the belt-tightening aspect of the 2008-2009 FUESD budget, Nelson says, "We will do everything to assist the district."


 

3 comments

Comment Profile ImageReader
Comment #1
"Under the present practice, if a job opening occurs, the district automatically looks for a qualified replacement from its own ranks. Ninety percent of the time, they fill jobs from within, Whitlock says."
I don't think that this statement is valid. It would be interesting to see the factual data on hires for vacancies.
Comment Profile ImageJim Whitlock
Comment #2
I read with interest the Village News article "Union favors costly merit system for FUESD", March 13, 2008. The current hiring system does favor current employees. One section of the collective bargaining agreement with FUESD’s classified employees does give "priority consideration" to current bargaining unit employees when it comes to filling vacancies. Another section assures current bargaining unit employees the right to be interviewed for any bargaining unit vacancy for which the employee meets the minimum qualifications. All vacancies are initially advertized internally, so current employees do enjoy a significant advantage when it comes to filling vacant positions.
Comment Profile ImageSickening
Comment #3
Does anyone think about the effect on the "kids" in this school district?

During an extreme budget crisis like we have today, THE UNIONS continue to march on with their agenda.

No wonder my children have never set foot in the LOUSY public schools of Fallbrook.

Years from now when things are WORSE at FUESD, ask your school district/union why. They won't have an answer. Just excuses.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.




Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.

RSS FeedFacebookTwitter



Advertisement for Fallbrook Healthcare Partners


Subscribe





Most Commented


Reach Local Customers



The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 1588 S. Mission Rd. Suite 200, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2014
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login