The Fallbrook Village News
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Translate this page

Temecula races to annex quarry land


Thursday, February 21st, 2008
Issue 08, Volume 12.
Peter Surowski
Staff Writer
You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.


Though only moving at a turtle’s pace, the race is too close to call. On February 12, the City of Temecula announced their plan to annex 4,900 acres of unincorporated land is in its final stage.

The announcement came as Granite Construction Inc., a mining and construction company, was finishing the last report it needs to obtain surface mining permits for the same piece of land. The two entities have been competing for rights to the same area since the city began planning to annex it last March.

Now the two entities are racing through their own sets of red tape to be the first to win rights to the land.

Critics of the city’s decision said the annexation is an attempt to stop a mining company from opening a granite quarry within the site.

Proponents of the city’s annexation have said the decision is part of an ongoing attempt to preserve the "pristine" hills that surround the city.

Opponents of the mining project – called Liberty Quarry – who came to City Hall to hear the announcement applauded the city’s actions.

"We’re very excited. This is what we’ve been waiting for," said Kathleen Hamilton, president of Save Our Southwest Hills (SOS-Hills), a quarry opposition group, in an interview after the announcement.

A long way to go

Granite is currently finishing its "draft environmental impact report," the same report the city finished this week.

"There are just a few pieces we’re putting together," Karie Reuther, the spokesperson for Granite, said of the report.

The next step for the reports from both Granite and the city is the same. The entities will display their plans for 45 days so the public can comment on them.

The city put their reports out for public comment this week. Granite expects to do the same by May.

Both Granite and the city are required to address the concerns of residents who comment on the plan. This makes predicting the completion date of the process impossible, Steve Brown, the city’s principle planner, said at the announcement.

"If we find there is a preponderance of comments on [a certain aspect of the plan] staff will spend 30 days working on a new plan," Brown said.

Though the city has a three-month lead, it has a big test ahead of it, said Reuther. The city needs to win the approval of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), a county agency in charge of monitoring city building.

"It depends on the pace their project goes through and if LAFCO approves it," said Reuther of the city’s lead. "It could take a while or it could go very quickly."

Granite is not required to go through this process.

To the victor go the spoils

If Granite stakes their claim on the land first, they will bore a 311-acre open-pit mine into a secluded hillside.

When Temecula later annexes the area, little will change for Granite except to whom they pay their taxes, Reuther said.

The quarry will create 100 high-wage jobs, pay $41 million in fees upon construction and pay more than $300 million more in taxes over the life of the quarry, she said.

If Temecula annexes the land first, however, the city will probably refuse to grant Granite surface mining permits, said Reuther.

Mayor Mike Naggar and Mayor pro-tem Maryanne Edwards showed opposition to the quarry by speaking at an anti-quarry rally last March, though they told the audience they were not there as representatives of the city.

Though the City of Temecula would receive only a modicum of the tax revenue the quarry would generate, it would suffer all the negative impacts of the quarry, Naggar told the crowd of more than 1,000 people last March.

Councilmembers have suggested creating a nature preserve on the land. The preserve would protect the area’s endangered mountain lion population and the purity of the Santa Margarita River, the last free-flowing river in Southern California, Edwards said in an e-mail.

The piece of land borders Temecula to its north and, to its west, the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, which critics say will be negatively impacted by the quarry.

Temecula will give residents access to the preserve, which will connect with the city’s trails system, Edwards said.

In addition, the city will open a visitor’s center, which will showcase the work scientists at the University of San Diego have been doing at the reserve.

"The land involved…would provide invaluable open space at the city’s southern border and would provide the final and only link that would connect two habitat corridors," Edwards said.

"It’s exciting to know that it’s in the works. Waiting is the hardest part," Jerri Arganda, a SOS-Hills board member, said after the announcement.

Nobody can predict who will finish wading through the bureaucracy first, Reuther said. "The process is anything but clear-cut."

Reuther expects the county to render a decision as soon as November. The city expects LAFCO to render a decision as soon as October.


 

4 comments


Comment Profile ImageRod Harlin, Fallbrook
Comment #1
Normally I'm against the municipal interference in private property owner's rights, but in this instance, "Go, Temecula, Go!"

Comment Profile ImageJohn M
Comment #2
I'm confused. The city wants to annex to "preserve" the area, yet another article stated it is to "develop" the property and the city wants to use an abandon Chateau as a headquarters for the "preserve". I would be most interested in knowing who has been buying property in the area in anticipation of the development

Comment Profile ImageSam G Construction worker
Comment #3 | Wednesday, May 27, 2009 at 11:37 am
I have lived in Temecula my entire life, and I am 21 years old. I have seen this land turn from empty fields, and ranch homes with few stoplights into a heavily populated city. I enjoy hiking in the Santa Margarita riverbed, it is a beautiful area. To turn this area into a mining operation absolutely disgusts me. I don't want to breathe in anymore dust than I already do at my work. I am no hippy or radical enviromentalist, but just leave the land alone!! Is the EPA atleast stepping in?? If not, then they are completely USELESS!

Comment Profile ImageSteve C, Temecula
Comment #4 | Friday, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:21 pm
This area's most important businesses are all agricultural. The wineries and olive groves in Temecula. The avocado and citrus orchards that cover the hills all around. It is these businesses, both small and large, which give the area its character. What will happen with all that granite dust in the air? What about the additional polution created by increased truck traffic? Even a fractional alteration of the soil pH could wreak havoc on our agricultural businesses, costing them countless millions or putting them out of business entirely. The obscuring of sunlight will have a profound effect on agricultural production. Literally thousands of jobs could be lost! This is to say nothing of the problems this quarry raises for the Pechanga tribe. Those lands are sacred to them. The success of the casino has a lot to do with the atmosphere in which it is found. We cannot allow this environmental disaster to take place.

Article Comments are contributed by our readers, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Fallbrook Village News staff. The name listed as the author for comments cannot be verified; Comment authors are not guaranteed to be who they claim they are.

 

Add your Comment


Name

Images, Formatting, or HTML is not allowed : plain text only. You may post up to 5 website addresses within your comment.
Disclaimer

The Fallbrook Village News has tightened its' policy regarding comments.
While we invite you to contribute your opinions and thoughts, we request that you refrain from using vulgar or obscene words and post only comments that directly pertain to the specific topic of the story or article.
Comments that are derogatory in nature have a high likelihood for editing or non-approval if they carry the possibility of being libelous.
The comment system is not intended as a forum for individuals or groups to air personal grievances against other individuals or groups.
Please, no advertising or trolling.
In posting a comment for consideration, users understand that their posts may be edited as necessary to meet system parameters, or the post may not be approved at all. By submitting a comment, you agree to all the rules and guidelines described here.
Most comments are approved or disregarded within one business day.



RSS Feed
Online Digital Edition
Sign up  for iNews
Earthquake Information

Other VNN Sites
The Village News
Temecula Valley News
Anza Valley Outlook
Fallbrook.org
Sourcebook

Advertisement for Quality Chevrolet
Reach Local Customers



Most Commented
The Fallbrook Village News The Fallbrook Village News
760-723-7319 - 127 West Elder Street, Fallbrook CA 92028
All contents copyright ©2012
About Us
Earthquake Information
Business Listings
Contact Us
Letter to the Editor
Report a website error
Sitemap
Online Digital Edition
RSS Feeds
Login